Philosophical Theology

A Non-Rationalistic Rational Theology


Attending A Same-Sex “Wedding” – Liberty or Disobedience?

I don’t see this subject as a matter of subjective conscience, but a good and necessary consequence of Scripture. If so, this would bind all without distinction. Because of the weightiness of the matter both biblically and relationally, I’ve taken the time to construct a deductive argument and even address a somewhat popularized objection I’ve seen in put forth in principle.

All should agree that the argument is valid – given the conclusion necessarily follows from the premises. The question is whether the argument is sound (i.e., are all the premises true.) Of course, if my conclusion is false, then at least one of the premises must also be false. The question is which one(s)!

Deduction is a handmaiden to biblical theology, as it isolates theological arguments in order for ideas to be evaluated with greater scrutiny. Accordingly, please don’t dismiss the content if it appears cold or too analytical.

A Deductive Argument Against Attending a Same Sex (SS) Wedding

Premise 1: Scripture establishes that a true marriage is exclusively a lifelong, covenantal union between one man and one woman; therefore, a SS union is structurally invalid and inherently a violation of God’s moral law.

Premise 2: Wedding guests are not passive observers, but explicit celebrants whose presence functions as a public endorsement, affirmation, and congratulatory witness of the union.

Premise 3: To attend and celebrate a a SS wedding is to publicly validate a lifestyle that Scripture defines as sinful, thereby rejoicing in wrongdoing and sharing in a work of rebellion against God.

Premise 4: God demands absolute, uncompromising loyalty from His disciples, explicitly commanding them to fear Him above man, avoid every appearance of evil, and refuse to affirm destructive sin – even when it costs them their closest earthly relationships.

Conclusion: Therefore, a Christian cannot attend a SS wedding without fundamentally compromising their witness, participating in sin, and violating their supreme allegiance to Jesus Christ.

Hypothetical objection: 

Because my loved ones already know my traditional beliefs, my presence at their wedding is not a theological endorsement of their marriage, but a radical demonstration of Christ-like love to preserve the relationship for future evangelism. Therefore, I can attend without compromising my allegiance to God.

Response to objections:

1. A Wedding is a Covenant, Not a Casual Dinner

A wedding is not a passive social gathering like a dinner party or graduation. Liturgically and legally, it is a formal covenant-vowing ceremony where the audience acts as official, celebratory witnesses who validate the union. If the covenant itself violates God’s moral law, a Christian cannot stand as its witness, applaud it, or celebrate it without actively participating in the affirmation of sin.

2. The False “Jesus Analogy”

While Jesus famously ate with tax collectors and befriended sinners, He never attended an event celebrating or institutionalizing a sin. He met sinners in their brokenness to call them out of it (“Go and sin no more”); He never stood as a congratulatory witness to the formalization of an unbiblical lifestyle. Proximity to a sinner is ministry; celebrating a sinful institution is compromise.

3. Truth is the Ultimate Witness

Maintaining relational harmony at the expense of biblical truth is not a Christian witness – it is a betrayal of it. True love cannot rejoice in what God calls wrongdoing. Jesus explicitly warned that supreme loyalty to Him would inevitably cause painful relational divisions, even with our closest family members (Matthew 10:37).

The Bottom Line: You cannot love a person by celebrating what God says harms them. Attending shifts a Christian from a loving outsider to an active participant, fundamentally compromising their allegiance to Christ.

Close:

Please know that these convictions are held with a heavy but resolute heart, deeply aware of the relational weight they carry. I lay this out in the hope that clarity brings peace through understanding and that we might all strive to love one another in the fullness of truth and grace.