It’s never pleasurable to read (i) caricatures, (ii) misunderstandings, (iii) reckless treatment of opposing views and (iv) badly formulated arguments – especially by other Christians. It is pleasurable, however, given such grave misfortune, to read precise interaction with such positions.
One wonderful thing about James’s work is his points of disagreement are always precisely articulated. (My prayer is that people will engage and if warranted change their views. I’ve never known James to bite or gloat.)
James interacts here with Davenant Institute’s attempt to interact with Pesuppositional Aplogetics.
James interacts here with J.V. Fesko’s attempt at Reforming Apologetics.
James interacts here with Richard Muller’s attempt to unhitch the Reformed tradition from theological determinism and its compatibilism implications.
James interacts here with David VanDrunen’s attempt to make sense of a 2K paradigm.
You must be logged in to post a comment.